apples and droids: turning ideas into IP

The following is a slightly longer version of the my article printed in The Jakarta Globe today (here). A bahasa Indonesia version will be posted later today with the help of Zata.

In the year 1270, Albertus Magnus, a German physician, astrologer and a master of the black arts, created a living automaton in the figure of a man. Using springs, levers and cogs, his invention was said to move and speak. He called it “android”. It is said that when he showed his “android” to his student, Thomas Aquinas, Thomas was so frightened that he smashed it to pieces and denounced it as "a tool of satan and a blasphemy to God".

The term was not used again until the 1860s, when it began to appear in US patents about miniature human-like toy automatons. Then in 1977, film director George Lucas introduced the world to the Star Wars “droids” C3PO and R2D2.

Jump forward 30 years and Lucasfilm is reaping the rewards of a bit of quick thinking. Before Star Wars was released, Lucasfilm registered a slew of trademarks, including the newly coined word “droid”. Today it is registered for everything from toys and games to mobile phones, computer software, MP3 players, laptops, PDAs, digital cameras and hand-held units like Sony’s PSP.

When Motorola announced the launch of its new mobile phone, the Droid, the press was quick to pick up on the association. “This is the droid you’re looking for”, quipped one reviewer, alluding to a scene in the Star Wars movie.

This is exactly why Lucasfilm went to such lengths to protect the word invented by George Lucas. They knew that consumers would make a connection to Star Wars if anyone else used the word “droid” --- even if used on something completely different, like a mobile phone.

Motorola knows it too. It is obvious that the phone’s operating system, Google Android, is the reason Motorola named its phone “Droid”. But Motorola’s advertising has a distinctively science fiction theme with images that remind you of the Terminator movies.

This would not have been possible without Lucasfilm and Motorola reaching some sort of agreement. Registering a trademark gives the owner the exclusive right to use the trademark. Motorola could not use the word “droid” without Lucasfilm’s consent because Lucasfilm has a trademark registration that covers “mobile phones”.  That’s exactly what Motorola did: it asked Lucasfilm to give it a trademark licence.

When it comes to defending its trademarks there is no-one feistier than Apple. The technology giant has launched a legal challenge to prevent Australian supermarket retailer Woolworths from registering and using its new logo, arguing it is too similar to its famous Apple trademark.

Woolworths insists that its logo is a stylised ''W'' in the shape of a piece of fruit. Apple thinks it’s an apple.

Apple will have to convince the Australian intellectual property office, IP Australia, that Woolworths logo is similar in principle to its own logo and therefore should not be registered as a trademark. This is no easy feat when it comes to logos. Apart from physical similarities and differences of the two logos, IP Australia also has to consider whether consumers will be confused by Woolworths logo.

The risk of consumer confusion is exactly why Apple is so concerned. It is unlikely that your average consumer is going to confuse Woolworths and Apple. One is a supermarket, the other sells computers, phones and MP3 players.

However, Woolworths has asked IP Australia to register the logo for much more than retail services, its core business. It wants to register the logo for use on a wide range of electrical goods that are typically found in Woolworths supermarkets, including MP3 players and mobile phones.

To complicate things, Apple now has a retail presence in Australia, with stores in Sydney, Melbourne and on the Gold Coast.

It’s easy to understand why Apple is concerned. It is anticipating the unexpected.

It is always worthwhile considering the commercial potential of your intellectual property—even though the potential may not be immediately obvious.

Intellectual property is often the edge which sets successful companies apart. A bit of commercial intelligence can turn an idea into a competitive advantage. Effectively managing intellectual property assets can help maintain a business’ competitive advantage.

These are two examples of how simple ideas can become major commercial issues. Anyone can have an idea. Make sure someone else doesn’t have yours.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   android   apple   google   ip australia   jakarta globe   motorola   trademark   woolworths  

Comments [3]

shock! motorola's droid is not the iphone?!!

Wired has a great run-down on Motorola's new Android smartphone --- the FIRST Android smartphone. Put simply, it is NICE. If you are interested, check it out.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   android   apple   droid   iphone   motorola  

Comments [0]

why are the so-called internet experts all so f---ing stupid?

Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and eBay will dominate the web going forward. One company of note that won’t? Google.

"Facebook is the future" says Sean Parker of Founder's Fund. Parker (who coincidentally help set up Facebook) predicts that "network services" like Facebook and Twitter will dominate the web in the future. Google -- which he calls an "information service" --- will be less dominant because "collecting data is less valuable than connecting people".

This is a good example of the ignorant social networking fanboy-ism that seems to dominate the technology news media today. These so-called experts have their heads shoved so far up their capital investment funded arses that they can't see anything but their own shit.

Here are the facts:

  • NO-ONE dominates the web --- not even Google. 
  • Information services and networking services go hand in hand. Take one away and the web is useless. 
  • Google provides both information services AND networking services --- um, Gmail? GoogleTalk? Aduh! 
  • Unless Facebook suddenly transforms into something actually USEFUL, its going to be nothing more than a bloated chat room.

Come on guys. Stop sniffing the petrol fumes!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   ebay   facebook   google   twitter  

Comments [4]

apple changes the world?

TechCrunch reveals Google's hotly anticipated on-line music store. Who would have thought that we would have THREE big on-line music retailers -- Apple, Amazon and Google?

We have Apple to thank for this fantastic development. It was Apple that forced the industry to accept change.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   google   music  

Comments [0]

75,000 (non-email) apps

Wired reports that two billion apps have been downloaded from the iTunes App Store and there are now 75,000 apps available to download.

I'm not sure how much you can make of the 2,000,000,000 download figure, given that according to iTunes I have downloaded 113 apps, and most of those appear to be re-downloads. But it is still very impressive and testament to a fantastic marketing machine.

My only question is why is the Apple Mail app still so crappy? I have resorted to Google's webmail alternative because it is so much better.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   app store   apple   iphone  

Comments [0]

not happy with itunes? stop whinging and innovate!

There's no shortage of whinging about iTunes -- including from me. There's no indexing of applications, the rating system sucks... the complaints go on and on.

To be fair, if I were Apple, I would be doing the bare minimum as well. The app approval process alone results in endless streams of complaints. Rating or indexing would only multiple this grief.

So we have this dilemma: demand, but no supply. Unsatisfied demand. A vacuum. A competition free vacuum. With a huge potential market.

Is anyone out there?! Hello!!!

Well, now there is. Say hello to oneforty and Fuel My App. Both serve different purposes, but with the same objective: adding value to the existing App Store experience. Check them out.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   140   app store   apple   fuel my app   innovation   iphone   itunes   oneforty  

Comments [0]

what is success? it's not always about the iphone

Last week, French techco Archos quietly launched its tablet, the Archos 5. The launch was largely ignored by the tech media. The only reason I heard about it was because the guys on TWiT (This Week in Tech) and MacBreak Weekly mentioned it briefly and talked about whether it would succeed.

This got me thinking, what is success? Do you have to beat Apple -- or Google for that matter -- to be successful? No, of course not. So why do we instantly compare new products not by their merits but by how we think they will fare against the market dominators?

Archos has been around since 1988 (an eternity in the IT sector) and is somewhat of market leader, bringing products to market well ahead of everyone else. The Archos 5 is one of the first (if not THE first) product of its type, an Android tablet. Archos is, by definition, a successful company and the Archos 5 will most likely be a successful product.

We seem to have forgotten that the world is bigger than Apple, Google and Microsoft. The smaller players out there are largely ignored by the media, or their products are dissed because they're not the next "iPhone killer".

Our rabid iPhone worship stifles competition. Is that a bad thing, when the iPhone is so good? Yes!!! Competition drives the very innovation that gave us the iPhone.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   archos   competition   iphone  

Comments [3]

steve jobs and apple: rebound

Steve Jobs was looking thin by otherwise well at the Apple media event yesterday. He gave a nice speech about why we should all think about becoming organ donors. He owes his life to someone who made that choice.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   steve jobs  

Comments [0]

apple snow leopard confusion

I finally managed to order my copy of Snow Leopard on the Apple Asia website. I have no idea when it will arrive --- if at all. You see, the email confirmation is a tad confusing. Under "shipment information" it says:

You selected to ship your items as they become available. We will let you know by email after your order ships.

Really? I didn't select anything of the sort. Maybe this was the default, but I certainly did not select this option. Further down the email under "order details" it says:

Ships within 24 hours.

Within 24 hours of what? Of my order, or "as it becomes available"? Further down under "delivery charge" it promises that it will ship on the "same business day" and between 14 and 16 September 2009. Interesting... today is 9 September 2009.

So which is it Apple? You have given 3 options for delivery: two days from now, next week and sometime in the future.

Why does this company win service awards?! Is it because Apple customers are all idiots?!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   customer   service   snow leopard  

Comments [5]

pass the lub, as we’re f**ked by apple too

At least Apple are equal opportunity ass f**kers.

This is definitely NSFW reading, but another reminder that the App Store is broken. I don't personally care about Apple's approval process. Still, it amazes me that a company that has such high customer service standards could be so... lazy when it comes to their OTHER customers -- the software developers.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   app store   apple   customer service   itunes  

Comments [4]

About

A hyper-opinionated bule with a deep fondness for Indonesia. Mildly outraged but mostly harmless.

Facebook
Delicious
Twitter