the google phone: it's official!!!

This is exciting! Google has made it official -- it will be launching the "Google Phone" in one month. It won’t be sold by a carrier like AT&T or TMobile, but will be unlocked -- this means we will probably get it here in Indonesia pretty soon. The details... 

  • Android 2.1 
  • Snapdragon chip 
  • It has a high-resolution OLED touchscreen 
  • thinner than the iPhone 
  • a voice-to-text feature is supposed to let you dictate emails and notes by speaking directly into the phone 
HTC is the manufacturer, but it won't be branded as HTC -- but as Google. Keren banget!
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   android   google  

Comments [1]

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   google   google wave  

Comments [4]

apples and droids: turning ideas into IP

The following is a slightly longer version of the my article printed in The Jakarta Globe today (here). A bahasa Indonesia version will be posted later today with the help of Zata.

In the year 1270, Albertus Magnus, a German physician, astrologer and a master of the black arts, created a living automaton in the figure of a man. Using springs, levers and cogs, his invention was said to move and speak. He called it “android”. It is said that when he showed his “android” to his student, Thomas Aquinas, Thomas was so frightened that he smashed it to pieces and denounced it as "a tool of satan and a blasphemy to God".

The term was not used again until the 1860s, when it began to appear in US patents about miniature human-like toy automatons. Then in 1977, film director George Lucas introduced the world to the Star Wars “droids” C3PO and R2D2.

Jump forward 30 years and Lucasfilm is reaping the rewards of a bit of quick thinking. Before Star Wars was released, Lucasfilm registered a slew of trademarks, including the newly coined word “droid”. Today it is registered for everything from toys and games to mobile phones, computer software, MP3 players, laptops, PDAs, digital cameras and hand-held units like Sony’s PSP.

When Motorola announced the launch of its new mobile phone, the Droid, the press was quick to pick up on the association. “This is the droid you’re looking for”, quipped one reviewer, alluding to a scene in the Star Wars movie.

This is exactly why Lucasfilm went to such lengths to protect the word invented by George Lucas. They knew that consumers would make a connection to Star Wars if anyone else used the word “droid” --- even if used on something completely different, like a mobile phone.

Motorola knows it too. It is obvious that the phone’s operating system, Google Android, is the reason Motorola named its phone “Droid”. But Motorola’s advertising has a distinctively science fiction theme with images that remind you of the Terminator movies.

This would not have been possible without Lucasfilm and Motorola reaching some sort of agreement. Registering a trademark gives the owner the exclusive right to use the trademark. Motorola could not use the word “droid” without Lucasfilm’s consent because Lucasfilm has a trademark registration that covers “mobile phones”.  That’s exactly what Motorola did: it asked Lucasfilm to give it a trademark licence.

When it comes to defending its trademarks there is no-one feistier than Apple. The technology giant has launched a legal challenge to prevent Australian supermarket retailer Woolworths from registering and using its new logo, arguing it is too similar to its famous Apple trademark.

Woolworths insists that its logo is a stylised ''W'' in the shape of a piece of fruit. Apple thinks it’s an apple.

Apple will have to convince the Australian intellectual property office, IP Australia, that Woolworths logo is similar in principle to its own logo and therefore should not be registered as a trademark. This is no easy feat when it comes to logos. Apart from physical similarities and differences of the two logos, IP Australia also has to consider whether consumers will be confused by Woolworths logo.

The risk of consumer confusion is exactly why Apple is so concerned. It is unlikely that your average consumer is going to confuse Woolworths and Apple. One is a supermarket, the other sells computers, phones and MP3 players.

However, Woolworths has asked IP Australia to register the logo for much more than retail services, its core business. It wants to register the logo for use on a wide range of electrical goods that are typically found in Woolworths supermarkets, including MP3 players and mobile phones.

To complicate things, Apple now has a retail presence in Australia, with stores in Sydney, Melbourne and on the Gold Coast.

It’s easy to understand why Apple is concerned. It is anticipating the unexpected.

It is always worthwhile considering the commercial potential of your intellectual property—even though the potential may not be immediately obvious.

Intellectual property is often the edge which sets successful companies apart. A bit of commercial intelligence can turn an idea into a competitive advantage. Effectively managing intellectual property assets can help maintain a business’ competitive advantage.

These are two examples of how simple ideas can become major commercial issues. Anyone can have an idea. Make sure someone else doesn’t have yours.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   android   apple   google   ip australia   jakarta globe   motorola   trademark   woolworths  

Comments [3]

google analytics: powerful, flexible and now with lemon scented freshness!

Google Analytics --- a must-have for the amateur blogger wannabe like me wanting to understand more about their website --- has introduced a bunch of new features that make it really, REALLY flash (as opposed to just "really flash").

What I like about Google Analytics (apart from the fact that it is free) is how easy it is to use. If you aren't already using Analytics, I suggest you go take a look.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   google   google analytics   video  

Comments [0]

why are the so-called internet experts all so f---ing stupid?

Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and eBay will dominate the web going forward. One company of note that won’t? Google.

"Facebook is the future" says Sean Parker of Founder's Fund. Parker (who coincidentally help set up Facebook) predicts that "network services" like Facebook and Twitter will dominate the web in the future. Google -- which he calls an "information service" --- will be less dominant because "collecting data is less valuable than connecting people".

This is a good example of the ignorant social networking fanboy-ism that seems to dominate the technology news media today. These so-called experts have their heads shoved so far up their capital investment funded arses that they can't see anything but their own shit.

Here are the facts:

  • NO-ONE dominates the web --- not even Google. 
  • Information services and networking services go hand in hand. Take one away and the web is useless. 
  • Google provides both information services AND networking services --- um, Gmail? GoogleTalk? Aduh! 
  • Unless Facebook suddenly transforms into something actually USEFUL, its going to be nothing more than a bloated chat room.

Come on guys. Stop sniffing the petrol fumes!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   ebay   facebook   google   twitter  

Comments [4]

apple changes the world?

TechCrunch reveals Google's hotly anticipated on-line music store. Who would have thought that we would have THREE big on-line music retailers -- Apple, Amazon and Google?

We have Apple to thank for this fantastic development. It was Apple that forced the industry to accept change.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   google   music  

Comments [0]

let the android games begin!

This 'summer' is looking like a winner when it comes to new mobile phones. Motorola and SonyEricsson are both launching high-end Android phones. SonyEricsson is updating its Xperia with the Android OS and a bunch of new features. I have to say, it looks nice.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   android   google   motorola   sonyericsson  

Comments [4]

google figured out where new zealand is

It looks like Google finally figured out that New Zealand is not in Egypt or Ireland. Over the weekend they fixed their search. Nice to know that they care! The funniest thing about this TechCrunch article is one of the comments:

"It’s a marketing ploy by NZ tourism, we are taking over your Google. Soon every site will just redirect to newzealand.com."

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   google   new zealand  

Comments [0]

google wave looks awfully like... microsoft office?

I must be missing something --- or stupid --- but I am having a hard time finding anything particularly revolutionary about Google Wave. Gina Trapani has written a great article with screenshots about how it works. But, to be honest, it seems to be awfully like Microsoft Office with your inbox sorted by 'conversation'.

The bloggers I am reading are going ga-ga over the fact that Wave is real-time. But it is very difficult for me to understand how useful this would actually be in a business context. There are plenty of collaborative tools out there that do exactly the same thing, such as GoToMyPC and Microsoft's own Sharepoint. So why the fuss over Google Wave? I really don't know and I suppose I won't until I get to have a play myself.

As for the predictions that Google Wave marks the end of email? Dream on. The techboys can rant all they like, but it is the business communities around the world that will decide email's fate. With billions of people using email -- and most of them using Microsoft Outlook -- I find it almost laughable that a beta product that does little more than replicate other products is going to revolutionise the way we communicate.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   google   google wave   microsoft   new media   office  

Comments [0]

google wave and the morons among us

We all still use email, of course. But email was better suited to the way we used to use the Internet—logging off and on, checking our messages in bursts. Now, we are always connected, whether we are sitting at a desk or on a mobile phone.

There is quite a bit of commentary floating around at the moment about Google's "new" product, Wave. The guys at TechCrunch are getting all spank-the-monkey happy, predicting the demise of email:

"For many of us, email is simply not cutting it the way that it used to", bemoans techwriter, MG Siegler. It's a bold statement, considering the BILLIONS of people who use email every day.

"Google Wave... is perhaps the most complete example yet of a desire to shift the way we communicate once again" Eh what? Google Wave is a PRODUCT launched by a COMPANY. It is an EXPERIMENT by a COMPANY to shift the way we communicate.

"I would consider email to be a passive form of communication... Twitter is very passive..." Pardon? Passive, active, top, bottom... Aduh!

"Google Wave is attempting to be a passive-agressive (sic) form of communication. You can actively (aggressively) engage in threads in real-time, or you can sit back and let messages come to you..." Oh, kind of like email?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   email   google   google wave   social media  

Comments [0]

About

A hyper-opinionated bule with a deep fondness for Indonesia. Mildly outraged but mostly harmless.

Facebook
Delicious
Twitter